Showing posts with label lunar trash. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lunar trash. Show all posts

Monday, December 17, 2012

The GRAIL spacecraft, Ebb and Flow, have ended their mission with crashes on the Moon


If you missed the action the JPL Ustream event has been archived at:
December 17, 2012

----------------------
----------------------
Before touchdown, when the moon was in day light, LRO imaged the expected crash point and will image it again when the moon is lite.  The actual crashes occurred while the lunar ridge was in shadow. The little washing machine sized spacecraft were destroyed but the flash wouldn't be bright enough to have been imaged here on Earth. 
(Someone can prove me wrong but having passed over a ridge on the northern part of the moon wouldn't help)
- LRK -

Impact points to be named after Sally Ride.
-LRK -

-----------------------
snip
By design, the final resting place was far away from the Apollo landing sites and other historical spots on the moon.
After the double impacts, mission chief scientist Maria Zuber of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology said the spot has been named after team member Sally Ride, the first American woman in space, who died earlier this year.
snip
-----------------------

NASA's GRAIL Lunar Impact Site Named for Sally Ride

NASA has named the site where twin agency spacecraft impacted the moon Monday in honor of the late astronaut Sally K. Ride, who was America's first ...

› Read More
-----------------------

This now adds two more spacecraft on the moon and and their respective debris fields.
- LRK -

-----------------------
These side-by-side, 3-D comparisons depict the unnamed lunar mountain targeted by the NASA's Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission for controlled impact of the Ebb and Flow spacecraft.
These side-by-side, 3-D comparisons depict the unnamed lunar mountain targeted by the NASA's Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission for controlled impact of the Ebb and Flow ...
-----------------------

As an added bit of information about the previous Apollo liter topic I am copying an email I received from Hu Davis.
With permission.
- LRK -

-----------------------
Larry,

Re trash on the Moon, I must confess.  

LM-5 did not get the benefit of the $10,000 (?) per pound  bounty to Grumman of the "Super Weight Improvement Program (SWIP)" to reduce inert mass.  An inducement that was afforded for LM-6 and subsequent.  Thus, Lunar Module 5, Eagle, was planned to fly in orbit about but not to land on the Moon, as it was considered to be overweight.  

My associate, Roger Hicks, and I did not like the idea of our managing the last one to not land, so we did our own inert mass reduction plan in one week - - about 18 months before its flight date - that included no bounty.  

We suggested to George Low that, before closing the hatch for ascent, Neil and Buzz toss overboard the unneeded EVA back packs, hoses, descent flight plans, etc.  Then, if George refused adding even a pound of inert mass for the18 months before July 16, 1969, we could move up the first landing from October to late July.  Something of a Sicilian offer.

He did and it did.  LM-5 landed on July 20, 1969, leaving behind the Descent stage, a turned-over American flag, several lunar experiments and all of the junk they had tossed overboard in order to (barely) make the mission.  We had about 20 seconds of propellants remaining at shutdown, even at the reduced thrust needed for hovering flight.  Buzz reminded me of this in public a number of times, but 20 seconds is a long time in rocket parlance.

During our first lunar orbit, we got what turned out to be a false report that there was a Russian spacecraft of an unknown type in lunar orbit with us.  Scary, but false!!  We were glad when Eagle landed and we found out there was not a pair of Russians racing us.

On my next Lunar Module 10, for Apollo 15, we also left behind the first lunar rover.  Thus, I must plead guilty to being a leading litter bug of the Apollo program.  I would do it again!  Two national monuments, not trash dumps!

To my recollection, this story was not a part of any of the TV shows or other popular records of Apollo.  Why, I do not know, unless SWIP was considered by the policy wonks at NASA Headquarters to have been an expensive embarrassment.

Hu

-----------------------


-----------------------

You may have your own opinions as to the value of continued missions to our moon and how they should be conducted. Please feel free to drop me a line at my Gmail account. 

I am getting too old to 'Fly me to the Moon' but you or yours may want to go. (75 New Years Eve) What you find there may be tempered by what has already arrived. 
- LRK -

-----------------------
moon landing is the arrival of a spacecraft on the surface of the Moon. This includes both manned and unmanned (robotic) missions. The first human-made object to reach the surface of the Moon was the Soviet Union's Luna 2 mission on 13 September 1959.[3]
The United StatesApollo 11 was the first manned mission to land on the Moon on 20 July 1969.[4] There have been six manned U.S. landings (between 1969 and 1972) and numerous unmanned landings, though no soft landings have occurred since 1976.


-----------------------

Thanks for looking with me.
- LRK -
=============================================
WHAT THE MIND CAN CONCEIVE, AND BELIEVE, IT WILL ACHIEVE - LRK -

=============================================

Astronauts' tracks, trash seen in new moon photos


My last post about the expected crash on the moon today, 12/17/12, of the twin orbiters Ebb an Flow from the GRAIL mission raised the comment from Vera about our previous missions to the moon leaving a lot of garbage and to be conscious of the mess we are doings....including astronauts´pee-bags!!

My thought was if humans go back to the moon some of the trash, including pee-bags, could be recycled.  In Japan cow poop on volcanic ash helps make soil. Others think they should be preserved as archiological items.

If we ever go back to the moon to get He3 we will need to have humans to maintain the machinery and I would expect a lot more trash would be generated.  Maybe this needs to be addressed to the Chinese or Russians since I don't see the USA going back in my lifetime.

It is something to consider and I thought I would see if anything has been posted about our Apollo trash.  Well have a look.
- LRK -

-----------------------

NASA releases new high-resolution views of three Apollo moon landing sites, sent back by Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. NBC's Brian Williams reports.
By Alan Boyle
NASA today released the sharpest views of three Apollo moon landing sites ever sent back by its Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.
"We all like to obsess and look at the Apollo landing site images because it's fun," said Arizona State University's Mark Robinson, principal investigator for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera, or LROC. "People actually used to be able to go to the moon. People used to explore the moon. Hopefully, sometime in the near future, that will continue again. But LROC is looking at the whole moon."
LRO's high-resolution camera has been looking at the whole moon, including all six of the Apollo landing sites, for the past two years. But these particular images are special because they were taken from the closest vantage point the orbiter will ever have during its $504 million mission. Because of adjustments in the car-sized probe's orbit, lately it's been flying as low as 14 miles (22 kilometers) above the lunar surface.
-----------------------
By SETH BORENSTEIN - AP Science Writer | AP – Tue, Sep 6, 2011
-----------------------

NASA LRO link
- LRK -

-----------------------
NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) captured the sharpest images ever taken from space of the Apollo 12, 14 and 17 landing sites. Images show the twists and turns of the paths made when the astronauts explored the lunar surface.
snip
-----------------------

Maybe teach recycling to the young ones and they will be concerned as future astonauis.
- LRK -

Recycling  On The Moon
Grade Level: 5 - 6

snip
-----------------------

And when we go back, if we go back.
- LRK -
.
-----------------------
Lunar Bases and Settlement
Excerpt from speech of John Marburger
Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy
Executive Office of the President
March 15, 2006
The Moon has unique significance for all space applications for a reason that to my amazement is hardly ever discussed in popular accounts of space policy. The Moon is the closest source of material that lies far up Earth's gravity well. Anything that can be made from Lunar material at costs comparable to Earth manufacture has an enormous overall cost advantage compared with objects lifted from Earth's surface. The greatest value of the Moon lies neither in science nor in exploration, but in its material. I am talking about the possibility of extracting elements and minerals that can be processed into fuel or massive components of space apparatus. The production of oxygen in particular, the major component (by mass) of chemical rocket fuel, is potentially an important Lunar industry.
What are the preconditions for such an industry? That, it seems to me, must be a primary consideration of the long range planning for the Lunar agenda. Science studies provide the foundation for a materials production roadmap. Clever ideas have been advanced for the phased construction of electrical power sources – perhaps using solar cells manufactured in situ from Lunar soil. A not unreasonable scenario is a phase of highly subsidized capital construction followed by market-driven industrial activity to provide Lunar products such as oxygen refueling services for commercially valuable Earth-orbiting apparatus.
snip
------------------------

Will be interesting to see how the GRAIL mission ends.
Live NASA commentary Dec. 17 2 p.m. PT (5 p.m. ET, 2200 UT)
- LRK -

-----------------------
For NASA TV streaming video, schedule and down link information, visit:
http://www.nasa.gov/ntv

The coverage will also be streamed live on Ustream at:
http://www.ustream.tv/nasajpl2
-----------------------

More than one way to think of planet habitability.
- LRK -

-----------------------
The Gaia hypothesis, also known as Gaia theory or Gaia principle, proposes that organisms interact with their inorganic surroundings on Earth to form a self-regulatingcomplex system that contributes to maintaining the conditions for life on the planet. Topics of interest include how the biosphereand the evolution of life forms affect the stability of global temperatureocean salinityoxygen in the atmosphere and other environmental variables that affect the habitability of Earth.
The hypothesis was formulated by the scientist James Lovelock [1] and co-developed by the microbiologist Lynn Margulis in the 1970s.[2] While early versions of the hypothesis were criticized for being teleological and contradicting principles of natural selection, later refinements have resulted in ideas highlighted by the Gaia Hypothesis being used in disciplines such as geophysiologyEarth system sciencebiogeochemistrysystems ecology, andclimate science.[3][4][5] In 2006, the Geological Society of London awarded Lovelock the Wollaston Medal largely for his work on the Gaia theory.[6]
-----------------------

Thanks for looking with me.
- LRK -
=============================================
WHAT THE MIND CAN CONCEIVE, AND BELIEVE, IT WILL ACHIEVE - LRK -

=============================================