Saturday, June 29, 2013

Twilight for Tiangong

Twilight for Tiangong

In keeping up with the news, some information on Tiangong 1.
- LRK -

---------------------------------------------
Twilight for Tiangong
by Morris JonesSydney, Australia (SPX) Jun 28, 2013


How long will Tiangong 1 remain in orbit? There's probably no urgent need to terminate its mission. While it remains aloft, the cameras can still be used and engineering studies can be performed. This is icing on the cake for the mission, providing more data for little extra investment

The return to Earth of China's Shenzhou 10 spacecraft has wrapped up an important chapter in spaceflight. China has now completed all crewed activity with Tiangong 1, the nation's first space laboratory. Tiangong 1 has had a long and busy service record since its launch in 2011, and the laboratory has now completed all of the major tasks assigned to it. Tiangong 1 is now in its twilight phase, but this does not mean that its story is complete.

Tiangong 1 is the first step in a long-term program to build a large Chinese space station. It has demonstrated critical tasks such as rendezvous and docking with Shenzhou spacecraft. Tiangong has received dockings from three missions, Shenzhous 8, 9 and 10.

The last two missions both carried astronauts to occupy the laboratory. It has shown that China can support astronauts in comfort for extended periods. There have also been experiments with manual dockings and different approach patterns for dockings. This rather small module has achieved a lot over its lifetime.

snip
Dr Morris Jones is an Australian space analyst who has reported on China's space program for SpaceDaily.com since 1999. Email morrisjonesNOSPAMhotmail.com. Replace NOSPAM with @ to send email
---------------------------------------------

Tiangong 1 information on spaceflight 101
- LRK -

---------------------------------------------
http://www.spaceflight101.com/tiangong-1-info.html
Tiangong 1 - Spacecraft Information

Tiangong 1 is China's first Space Station Module that is the nation's first step towards its ultimate goal of developing, building, and operating a large Space Station as a permanent human presence in Low Earth Orbit. The vehicle was launched on September 29, 2012 aboard a Long March 2F Launch Vehicle. The Space Station Module is planned to welcome 3 visiting vehicles, the unmanned Shenzhou 8 test flight to demonstrate Rendezvous and Docking technology and the manned Shenzhou 9 and 10 missions that will utilize Tiangong 1 for experiments and tests associated with 'living in space'. Tiangong 1 is planned to be deorbited in 2013 and replaced by Tiangong 2, a larger, more sophisticated Space Laboratory. Tiangong 3 will follow by 2016 to prepare the final steps on the way to a large Station in Low Earth Orbit. Chinese Officials have indicated that their new space station will be as big as the US Skylab Space Station that orbited Earth in the 1970s. This large station is expected to open for business by 2020 - according to Chinese sources. Tiangong means Heavenly Palace. Tiangong-1 orbits Earth at 330 to 370 Kilometers with an inclination of 42 degrees.

snip
---------------------------------------------

Images and information on CNTV
- LRK -

---------------------------------------------
Tiangong 1 China's First Space Rendezvous and Docking Task

snip
---------------------------------------------

Other news that has happened.
- LRK -

---------------------------------------------
News Archive: July 2012 - April 2013
snip
---------------------------------------------

Thanks for looking up with me.
============================================

WHAT THE MIND CAN CONCEIVE, AND BELIEVE, IT WILL ACHIEVE - LRK -

============================================

Mission accomplished as Chinese astronauts return to Earth

A work in progress.
- LRK -

---------------------------------------------
Mission accomplished as Chinese astronauts return to Earth
By Tim Hume, CNN
updated 4:29 AM EDT, Thu June 27, 2013

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Three Chinese astronauts return after their country's longest manned space voyage
  • Zhang Xiaoguang: "We are dreamers, and we have now fulfilled our dream"
  • Shenzhou-10 twice docked with the orbiting space station Tiangong-1
  • Part of ambitious multi-billion dollar program to establish manned space station by 2020
 snip
Hong Kong (CNN) -- Three Chinese astronauts have returned safely to Earth after completing their country's longest manned space voyage, with their mission hailed by their bosses as a "complete success."

Nie Haisheng, commander of the Shenzhou-10 crew, was the first to emerge from the descent module after it touched down by parachute in an expanse of Inner Mongolian grasslands on Wednesday morning after 15 days in space. He was followed by Wang Yaping, the only female astronaut of the mission, and Zhang Xiaoguang.

"We are dreamers, and we have now fulfilled our dream," Zhang was quoted as saying by the state media China Daily as saying. "Our space dream knows no boundary, and our hard work will never cease."

Vice Premier Zhang Gaoli, watching a broadcast of the descent from the Beijing Aerospace Command and Control Center, congratulated the astronauts on behalf of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China.

snip
---------------------------------------------

More pictures and information.
- LRK -

---------------------------------------------

Mission accomplished! Chinese astronauts return from historic trip to their space station... and plan permanent base by 2020

The Shenzhou 10 capsule landed safely in Inner Mongolia after 15 days aboard the Tiangong 1 space station

The station is a prototype with China hoping to launch a permanent version by 2020
The mission is the longest a manned Chinese spacecraft has been in orbit - beating Shenzhou 9 by two days
During the mission, the three astronauts beamed a live physics class to 60 million school children

PUBLISHED: 04:06 EST, 26 June 2013 UPDATED: 10:22 EST, 26 June 2013

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2348729/Chinese-astronauts-return-safely-experimental-mission-China-ramps-plans-launch-permanent-space-station-2020.html#ixzz2XdOOxu10
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 snip
---------------------------------------------

Many topics that might be of interest.
- LRK -

---------------------------------------------
News Archive: July 2012 - April 2013
snip
---------------------------------------------

Thanks for looking up with me.
=============================================

WHAT THE MIND CAN CONCEIVE, AND BELIEVE, IT WILL ACHIEVE - LRK -

============================================

Friday, June 28, 2013

Power Surge - NOVA Special

Just watched a PBS NOVA program on how we can help decrease the warming of our global climate.
It was refreshing to see the excitement from those that are making a difference.

If you check out the PBS website there is button where you can watch the show if you missed it. (53 min.)
Originally aired back in 2011. Transcript and other related links available there as well.
- LRK -

--------------------------------------------
Power Surge

Power Surge

Are we finally on the brink of a clean energy revolution? Aired April 20, 2011 on PBS

Program Description

Can emerging technology defeat global warming? The United States has invested tens of billions of dollars in clean energy projects as our leaders try to save our crumbling economy and our poisoned planet in one bold, green stroke. Are we finally on the brink of a green-energy "power surge," or is it all a case of too little, too late?

From solar panel factories in China to a carbon capture-and-storage facility in the Sahara desert to massive wind and solar installations in the United States, NOVA travels the globe to reveal the surprising technologies that just might turn back the clock on climate change. NOVA will focus on the latest and greatest innovations, including everything from artificial trees to green reboots of familiar technologies like coal and nuclear energy. Can our technology, which helped create this problem, now solve it?

Learn more about the "carbon calculator" discussed in the program at this site from the Cool Climate Network.
snip
-------------------------------------------

And what about a Fusion Power generator?

And this from the comments section of E-Cat World
- LRK -

-----------------------------------
snip

The lead scientist Tom McGuire mentioned in the presentation did his Phd on “Inertial Electrostatic Confinement Fusion Devices” – you can read all 250+ pages of it at http://ssl.mit.edu/publications/theses/PhD-2007-McGuireThomas.pdf

Talk-Polywell.org a discussion forum for Polywell fusion

 snip
---------------------------------------------

Thanks for looking up with me.
============================================

WHAT THE MIND CAN CONCEIVE, AND BELIEVE, IT WILL ACHIEVE - LRK -

============================================

Thursday, June 27, 2013

NASA ADMINISTRATOR MEDIA AVAILABILITY AT KENNEDY JUNE 28

Maybe the media will tell us what happens here.
- LRK -

-------------------------------------------------------------------
June 27, 2013

David Weaver
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-1600
david.s.weaver@nasa.gov

MEDIA ADVISORY: M13-101

NASA ADMINISTRATOR MEDIA AVAILABILITY AT KENNEDY JUNE 28

WASHINGTON -- NASA Administrator Charles Bolden will hold a media
availability at the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex in Florida
at 1 p.m. EDT Friday, June 28.

Bolden, Kennedy Center Director Robert Cabana and officials from the
state of Florida will discuss NASA's future spaceflight programs and
initiatives. These include plans to launch astronauts from Kennedy to
study an asteroid and work with commercial companies to send crew to
low Earth orbit and the International Space Station from Florida's
Space Coast in the next four years. They also will provide updates
about ongoing progress to transform Kennedy into a multi-user
spaceport for both government and commercial clients.

The event will not be broadcast on NASA Television or online. Media
interested in participating in the availability and other events at
the visitor complex June 28 should contact Nancy Glasgow at
nancy@bitner.com or 407-375-2433.

For information about the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex, visit:
http://www.kennedyspacecenter.com

For more information about NASA's missions and programs, visit:
http://www.nasa.gov

-end-

To subscribe to the list, send a message to:
hqnews-subscribe@mediaservices.nasa.gov
To remove your address from the list, send a message to:
hqnews-unsubscribe@mediaservices.nasa.gov
-------------------------------------------------------------------

"The event will not be broadcast on NASA Television or online."

I guess we won't watch this meeting.

Hmmm. - "Bolden, Kennedy Center Director Robert Cabana and officials from the state of Florida will discuss NASA's future spaceflight programs and initiatives"

Thanks for looking up with me.  
- LRK -
 
============================================
snip
Download: Space Policy and the Constitution
By Dr. Harrison H. Schmitt. Prologue: (“Is there a path forward for United States’ space policy? When a new President takes office in 2013, he or she should propose to Congress that we start space policy and its administration from scratch. A new agency, the National Space Exploration Administration (NSEA), should be charged with specifically enabling America’s and its partners’ exploration of deep space, inherently stimulating education, technology, and national focus. The existing component parts of NASA should be spread among other agencies with the only exception being activities related to U.S. obligations to its partners in the International Space Station (ISS).” — HHS). The Foreword was written by Michael D. Griffin, noted physicist, aerospace engineer and NASA Administrator (2005-2009): (“Jack makes the case for space as no one else can, and he shows how and why we are on the wrong path— leaving the rest of us with the question: what can we do to obtain the leadership we need instead of the leadership we have?”— MDG).
Download Full PDF Booklet (~7.1 Mb)Download Full PRC File for Kindle (~1.0 Mb)
Download_PDFDownload_Kindle
snip
============================================

WHAT THE MIND CAN CONCEIVE, AND BELIEVE, IT WILL ACHIEVE - LRK -

============================================

Asteroids in our Future

I would recommend reading Paul Gilster's recent blog on the topic of asteroids in our future.
He has many other interesting blogs as well. 

This quote from his Charter - "In Centauri Dreams, Paul Gilster looks at peer-reviewed research on deep space exploration, with an eye toward interstellar possibilities."

Paul should help your looking up experience.
- LRK -

-------------------------------------------

Asteroids in our Future

by PAUL GILSTER on JUNE 27, 2013

NASA has released an Asteroid Initiative Request for Information on the issue of asteroid retrieval. It’s an interesting document both in its audience — the agency is making a point about soliciting comments not only from academics, scientists and engineers but the general public — but also because of the issues it explores. Being sought are ideas on how best to capture an asteroid, land an astronaut on one, and change its orbit, not necessarily in that order. The Los Angeles Times quotes NASA associate director Robert Lightfoot on the public component of NASA’s initiative:
“Too often, by the time we present a mission to the public, it has already been baked, and there’s not much we can change. This is your chance to present your ideas to us before the mission is baked.”
If you’re interested in contributing, move quickly, for the deadline for responses is July 18, with a workshop to follow in September.
snip
-------------------------------------------

After you read Paul Gilster's blog you may want to be entertained by listening to Phil Plait, if you haven't already done so.
- LRK -

-------------------------------------------
How Can We Defend Earth From Asteroids?
"When I go outside and it's clear? Yeah, I look up. It's a habit. It's something I wish more people did. You may seem something that will profoundly affect you."— Phil Plait
Gazing up at the night sky is simultaneously humbling and utterly thrilling. This hour, we'll hear from TED speakers who share an infectious sense of wonder and curiosity about our place in the universe and what lies beyond our skies.
snip
-------------------------------------------

Jeff Foust has some thoughts about the asteroid mission as well.
- LRK -

-------------------------------------------

Redirecting an asteroid mission
by Jeff Foust
Monday, June 24, 2013
 
When NASA released its fiscal year 2014 budget proposal two and a half months ago, a key element of it was a new “asteroid initiative” that called for $105 million for various asteroid search and technology development efforts. The centerpiece of that plan was a robotic mission to capture a small near Earth asteroid, no more than about ten meters across, and move it into cislunar space, where it could potentially be visited by astronauts on the first crewed Orion mission, slated for 2021 (see “To catch a planetoid”, The Space Review, April 22, 2013).

That proposed mission—called at the time the Asteroid Retrieval Mission, or ARM—raised more than a few eyebrows when NASA announced it in April. Some questioned the technical feasibility of the concept (which is based on a 2012 study by the Keck Institute for Space Studies at Caltech) while others wondered how useful it would be for science or human exploration. Now, with some members of Congress making moves to block the effort, NASA is showing signs of subtly shifting the focus of the proposed mission, and the overall initiative, more towards the less controversial role planetary defense.
snip
-------------------------------------------

Will continue to watch along with you.
Thanks for looking up with me.  
- LRK -
 
============================================

WHAT THE MIND CAN CONCEIVE, AND BELIEVE, IT WILL ACHIEVE - LRK -

============================================

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

What goes on behind the foot lights?

In the last post I said, 'And the hands are raised and you hear the shouts, "Fund me, fund me!"'
Kendall noted that I was getting good at being cynical about the space program in general, and funding in particular.

I mentioned that I should sit with the audience and see what it is I am saying behind the foot lights.  
Maybe I wave my arms too much and come across with an attitude that says,.
 "SEE ME, SEE ME, HEAR WHAT I HAVE TO SAY AND BE AMAZED!"  :-)

Sorry about that. Looking at how missions do finally get implemented is worth noting but takes more research to uncover.
(All those negative sound bites are so easy to copy.)   

Does one report it took a long time to get the mission approved or that dedication and persistence, with the ability to adapt to changing requirements, triumphs?.

Many years were spent getting NASA to okay the Kepler mission but Bill Borucki wouldn't give up.
- LRK -

---------------------------------------------
snip
The idea of using transits to detect extrasolar planets was first published in 1971 by computer scientist Frank Rosenblatt. Kepler’s principal investigator, William Borucki, expanded on that idea in 1984 with Audrey Summers, proposing that transits could be detected using high-precision photometry. The next sixteen years were spent proving to others—and to NASA—that this idea could work.
snip
After revising, testing, publishing, and proposing for nearly twenty years, Kepler was finally approved as a Discovery mission in 2001

snip
---------------------------------------------

Had Bill not kept up the good fight I wouldn't have gotten to write a bit of LabView code to control some of the components on the tester that was built to show you could extract information about the slight dimming that would be caused by a transiting planet.
- LRK -

---------------------------------------------
snip
“To prove we could reliably detect a brightness change of 84 ppm, we needed a method to reduce the light by that amount. If a piece of glass is slid over a hole, the glass will reduce the flux by 8 percent—about one thousand times too much,” Borucki explained. “Adding antireflection coatings helped by a factor of sixteen, but the reduction was still sixty times too large. How do you make the light change by 0.01 percent?

“There really wasn’t anything that could do the job for us, so we had to invent something,” said Borucki. “Dave Koch realized that if you put a fine wire across an aperture—one of the drilled holes—it would block a small amount of light. When a tiny current is run through the wire, it expands and blocks slightly more light. Very clever. But it didn’t work.”

With a current, the wire not only expanded, it also curved. As it curved, it moved away from the center of a hole, thereby allowing more light to come through, not less.

“So Dave had square holes drilled,” said Borucki. “With a square hole, when the wire moves off center, it doesn’t change the amount of light. To keep the wire from bending, we flattened it.” The results demonstrated that transits could be detected at the precision needed even in the presence of on-orbit noise.

snip
---------------------------------------------

The Mars rovers might not have ever made it to Mars if Steve Squyres hadn't persisted and found ways to overcome the obstacles.
- LRK -

---------------------------------------------
Roving Mars: Spirit, Opportunity, and the Exploration of the Red Planet
By Steve Squyres
Scribe
422 pages
ISBN 1401301495
1401301495
AUD$49.95
The Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in Washington is one of the great museums of the world. It is awe-inspiring to see artefacts from the 1903 Wright Flyer to the original Apollo 11 command module. They demonstrate a tradition of brilliant, painstaking design and engineering in the face of environments hostile to man and machine.
Steve Squyres, the scientific principal investigator of the team that proposed, designed and built the Mars rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, is proud to be part of that tradition. But there were plenty of problems along the way. Before the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) project, Squyres had painful years of rejected proposals, starting with one in 1993 for a camera to go on the Mars Environmental Survey Pathfinder. When the MER team finally did receive approval from NASA to construct the rovers, the time frame was almost impossibly brief, with immense technical problems to surmount.
Then, in 2003, when a lastminute problem emerged just before the start of the launch window, it looked as though the launch of Spirit and Opportunity might be delayed until the next good window in 2005, or even permanently. And while Squyres was arguing for the launch to go ahead, an important NASA official told him, depressingly, “I think they’d look pretty damn good over in the Air and Space Museum.” That particular problem – as with all those that had preceded it – was finally solved by the hardworking team, but more just kept on coming.
snip

snip
---------------------------------------------

I would imagine that most missions have their own set of problems and that solving them is what engineers like to do.

And if you read Alan Binder's book you will note other kinds of problems, not so easily fixed by engineers..
- LRK -

---------------------------------------------
Lunar Prospector: Against All Odds [Paperback]Alan B. Binder (Author)

Lunar Prospector, Against all Odds is the Principal Investigator’s highly personal account of the triumphs, defeats, dirty politics, and ultimate success enjoyed and endured during the 13 years it took to accomplish the Lunar Prospector mission. Like the mission, Lunar Prospector, Against all Odds answers to the American taxpayer, but this time spotlighting the incompetence and self-serving activities of the NASA bureaucracy and accompanying aerospace industries. Together, they waste a large portion of the $13 billion yearly federal government budget to execute America’s space program.

The Lunar Prospector mission was the only NASA funded space project that was conceived and managed by a scientist rather than a NASA bureaucrat or engineer — a venture initially developed outside NASA that proved when missions are properly conceived and managed, the cost of space exploration can be cut by a factor of 10.

Lunar Prospector, Against all Odds shines light on the faltering American space program, however, it also provides new hope and vision — one for transforming the tired space industry into an efficient, commercially based, and profit-driven program that eliminates the federal government handouts which so lucratively line the pockets of the huge aerospace industry.
snip

snip
---------------------------------------------

Having played a small part in helping NASA Ames Research Center provide Lunar Prospector data to be displayed on a web site and being a passive watcher of the daily goings on, I would beg to differ with some of Alan Binder's portrayal of the Lunar Prospector mission.

As I mentioned, maybe I should sit with you and see what it is I am saying behind those foot lights.  
Please feel free to give me a nudge, nudge, and let me know what kind of arm waving you would like to see.

Thanks for looking up with me.  
- LRK -
 
============================================

WHAT THE MIND CAN CONCEIVE, AND BELIEVE, IT WILL ACHIEVE - LRK -

============================================

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Ten Thousandth Near-Earth Object Discovered

The work goes on to see what is out there that might find its way here and make for a big boom.  What we do with the information remains to be seen. It often comes down to money that has to be shared among a lot of mission requests.  

It might be said that the squeaky wheel gets the grease, but sometimes when no grease is available the wheel may catch fire or just seize up, break, and fall off. Your interpretation of the sound bites may vary.  :-)
- LRK -

---------------------------------------------
Ten Thousandth Near-Earth Object Discovered

June 25, 2013:  More than 10,000 asteroids and comets that can pass near Earth have now been discovered. The 10,000th near-Earth object, asteroid 2013 MZ5, was first detected on the night of June 18, 2013, by the Pan-STARRS-1 telescope, located on the summit of the Haleakala crater on Maui. Managed by the University of Hawaii, the PanSTARRS survey receives NASA funding.

"Finding 10,000 near-Earth objects is a significant milestone," said Lindley Johnson, program executive for NASA's Near-Earth Object Observations (NEOO) Program at NASA Headquarters. "But there are at least 10 times that many more to be found before we can be assured we will have found any and all that could impact and do significant harm to the citizens of Earth."

Near-Earth objects (NEOs) are asteroids and comets that can approach the Earth's orbital distance to within about 28 million miles (45 million kilometers). They range in size from as small as a few feet to as large as 25 miles (41 kilometers) for the largest near-Earth asteroid, 1036 Ganymed. Ninety-eight percent of all known near-Earth objects were first detected by NASA-supported surveys:statistics 

snip
---------------------------------------------

You may view charts and visuals of the numbers here.
- LRK -

---------------------------------------------
NEO Discovery Statistics

Some entries in the following charts and tables are dependent upon a diameter that is roughly inferred from the object’s estimated absolute magnitude (H) and its assumed reflectivity, or albedo. The absolute magnitude (H) of a near-Earth asteroid (NEA) is a measure of the object's brightness one astronomical unit from the sun and Earth and at zero phase angle (i.e., the angle between the sun and Earth, as seen from the NEA, is zero). The absolute magnitude (H) for a particular NEA is computed from the observed apparent magnitudes of the object at various times when the phase angles and the distances from the sun and Earth are known. An effective diameter is the diameter of a hypothetical spherical NEA that would provide the same apparent brightness as the observed NEA, whose actual shape is unknown.

Since most NEAs do not have a known reflectivity, or albedo, this albedo must be estimated before the H values, representing intrinsic brightness, can be converted to an approximate diameter. Pravec et al (2012) determined that, for their sample of 583 main-belt asteroids and NEAs, the mean albedos and their standard deviations are 0.057 (±0.013) for the Tholen/Bus/DeMeo C/G/B/F/P/D types and 0.197 (±0.051) for the S/A/L types. Since the albedos for NEAs are most likely to be either approximately 6% for asteroids of the C-type and associated taxonomic classes or 20% for asteroids of the more populous S-type and associated taxonomic classes, we have used an approximate mean value of 14% albedo and an H value of 17.75 to represent a one kilometer spherical NEA. Since the determined H values are uncertain, and likely biased by a few tenths (see Pravec et al., 2012, Icarus) and the single 14% albedo is only a rough mean representing a bimodal albedo distribution, the estimated numbers of one kilometer and larger sized objects in the tables below are very rough. However, these statistics are useful for monitoring the annual NEA discovery progress.

Using near-infrared data provided by the WISE spacecraft in 2010 and early 2011, Mainzer et al (2011) were able to determine diameters and albedos for 250 NEAs with a minimum uncertainty of 10% and 20% respectively. Hence they were able to determine the albedo distribution of these objects with known diameters and this distribution was then used to compute diameters for previously known NEOs with known H values but unknown diameters or albedos. They provided an estimate of 981 (±19) NEAs as the total population of NEAs one kilometer and larger. At the time of their analysis (Spring 2011), they also estimated that 911 (±17) of these large NEAs had already been discovered. While this latter estimate is both higher and more accurate than the estimated numbers given for Spring 2011 in the following tables, this statistical technique cannot be easily employed for day-to-day estimates of the population of NEAs one kilometer and larger. In the following tables, we will continue to use the simpler method described in the previous paragraph.
snip
---------------------------------------------

"Grand Challenges," let me clear my throat, ach, hmm, for whom?
- LRK -

---------------------------------------------
White House, NASA want help hunting asteroids
June 22, 2013

By Joel AchenbachThe Washington Post

WASHINGTON — The White House and NASA on Tuesday will ask the public for help finding asteroids that potentially could slam into the Earth with catastrophic consequences.

Citing planetary defense, the administration has decided that the search for killer rocks in space should be the latest in a series of "Grand Challenges," in which the government sets an ambitious goal, helps create public-private partnerships and sometimes offers prize money for innovative ideas.

"This is really a call to action to find all asteroid threats to human populations and know what to do about them," NASA Deputy Administrator Lori Garver said Monday. She said the asteroid hunt would help prove that "we're smarter than the dinosaurs."

- See more at: http://randolphguide.com/features/x1885652768/White-House-NASA-want-help-hunting-asteroids#sthash.8Rw4soIV.dpuf

snip
---------------------------------------------

Finding what is out there is important if you want to go catch an asteroid or push one around. How you define a set of missions will have to take into account risk and cost, and just what are the benefits. We seem to do a lot of talking.and I don't know that the asteroids are listening. :-)
- LRK -

---------------------------------------------
House Hearing Shows Opposition to Asteroid Mission, Divisions on Draft Bill

Marcia S. Smith
Posted: 19-Jun-2013
Updated: 20-Jun-2013 12:46 AM
The House subcommittee hearing on a draft 2013 NASA Authorization Act this morning showed continued skepticism about or opposition to the Obama Administration's proposed asteroid initiative.  It also revealed that even some Republicans on the subcommittee object to certain provisions of the draft bill.
Rep. Steve Palazzo (R-MS), chairman of the Space Subcommittee of the House Science, Space and Technology Committee, began the hearing by praising the committee's outreach efforts in drafting the bill saying that it was the result of "input from a wide variety of interests throughout the science and space communities."   Somewhat surprisingly then, not only did subcommittee Democrats and both witnesses -- NASA Advisory Council Chairman Steve Squyres and retired industry executive Tom Young -- express deep reservations about the bill, but the subcommittee's vice chairman, Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL), said he "may have to oppose it."  
Brooks's complaint is the $1.4 billion for the Space Launch System (SLS) included in the bill is insufficient.  He read from an email sent by former NASA Administrator Mike Griffin and a letter from an unnamed former NASA official both insisting that a minimum of $1.8 billion is needed for that program.  SLS is being built at Marshall Space Flight Center, which Brooks represents.
The total amount of funding provided by the bill is $16.845 billion for FY2014 and for FY2015.  A provision in the bill says that if Congress repeals or replaces the sequester and additional funds become available, they are to be spent 50 percent for the International Space Station (ISS), 25 percent for commercial crew, and 25 percent for SLS.
Not everyone on the committee is a fan of SLS, however.   Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA), vice chairman of the full committee and a strong supporter of commercial space, called it the "SLS Titanic," saying it is not sustainable and will drain money from everything else.  He asked Squyres, who is best known as the principal investigator for the Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunity, if SLS is a prerequisite for sending people to Mars.  Squyres said that some sort of heavy lift rocket is needed, but his main concern is that NASA is being asked to do too much with too little:  "We can afford to utilize the space station.... We can afford to develop SLS and to do it on a safe and reasonable schedule. But I don't see that we can do both."  Squyres also expressed concern about the low launch rate expected for SLS -- perhaps one launch every two years -- an issue he has emphasized in the past
Later, Rep. Bill Posey (R-FL) asked Squyres and Young when we could send people to Mars if we started right now.    Squyres asked "with the current budget?" and then turned to Young, who quickly responded "never."  Squyres added "I agree."
snip
---------------------------------------------

And the hands are raised and you hear the shouts, "Fund me, fund me!"

---------------------------------------------
How Can We Defend Earth From Asteroids?
"When I go outside and it's clear? Yeah, I look up. It's a habit. It's something I wish more people did. You may seem something that will profoundly affect you."— Phil Plait
Gazing up at the night sky is simultaneously humbling and utterly thrilling. This hour, we'll hear from TED speakers who share an infectious sense of wonder and curiosity about our place in the universe and what lies beyond our skies.
snip
--------------------------------------------

Thanks for looking up with me.
- LRK -
 

WHAT THE MIND CAN CONCEIVE, AND BELIEVE, IT WILL ACHIEVE - LRK -

===========================================